New page: aindexhttpsoniakasten3comhtm – A:\index.http.soniakasten.com.htm (Editar)
New page: aindexhttpsoniakasten3comhtm – A:\index.microsoft.htm (Editar)
New page: aindexhttpsoniakasten3comhtm – A:\index.htm (Editar)
Posted December 24, 2006 by bgcentroestudios
Categories: Uncategorized
CONTENIDO DE ‘SPLITTERS’ PUBLICADO EN SONIAKASTEN TAL Y COMO APARECE EL 21.12.2006 TRAS PUBLICACIÓN EL 19.12.2006
Splitters
December 20, 2006
On new technology viruses
Filed under: journalism, justice, Computering, Politics and social organization — soniakasten @ 7:08 pm Yesterday I was really furious. So furious, that it was only after seeing the accident happened by introducing the copy of my mail into WP, that I started laughing and laughing and I almost forgot my anger.What happened really. First, that people who are not worth there titles should definitely be thrown out without second thought, and this, regarding viruses (among many other). As Mr Shrimtico happens not to know what a virus is and he yes he is I don’t know what I don’t know where, of course everyone has to listen to him, even if what he says is bullshit. And this may cause a damage of millions to private and public subjects.ADVICE: before you listen to anyone try to understand what he is saying and after VERIFY! For God’s sake.Many people don’t know that a virus is recognizable because it has the mark of an active function on it. Something like this: ~. This symbol does usually mean that a document is open. When a closed document shows a double with this symbol, it means that one of the functions kept by it contains a virus. The double document has the same name than the original document having introduced the virus. Yesterday I discovered the virus that had come through the Microsoft page. As there are many types of viruses and some very harmful, I thought that perhaps the very fact of eliminating the virus could put it into functioning. Thus, very carefully transporting it from its original place to the bulk and vice versa, I finally decided to copy it on a 31/2 inch disc. The effect was desastruous. The disk was completely destroyed and as it happened that I had several disks on the desk, I took one I thought empty which was full of important documents. From there my fury. I try thus to formate the disk, which has as consequence that the function ‘formate’ in 5 computers is annihilated. To consider the little poison…Quite angry thus I step into an internet café, as I start becoming afraid that a general attack through earth, air and see may not be launched on me. Or the computer. (Sometimes I feel it’s more or less the same, I take aggressions on computers very personally…) To find the address of Microsoft US seems impossible, so that I try with Microsoft
Spain. (These pages are full of spyprograms anyhow, so that must have been staring at each other for a few minutes.) Microsoft
Spain shows at least the possibility of writing in a box under complaints (quejas) (!!) under sub category: virus, which seems to fit my affair quite well. I write thus my letter and am about sending it, when … the idiots want to connect the machine to Outlook Express. So what do you want the box for if you are to send the mail through Outlook and on top you have already asked for my e-mail address? Now, that was enough. After trying once or twice I ask the boy what the devil is the server of the shop and he doesn’t know very well. I try again three or four times and quite fed up, I decide to keep a copy of the letter. And, the function doesn’t work! I start changing color from red to green through purple and say, ok., copy all, and take the page where I have written my message. I paste all into the WordPress blog, thinking of course it will happily just copy my message, and … the whole Microsoft page appears! It was the moment to burst out laughing, and I went out of the shop thinking: you deserve it well, Microsoft, don’t care a shit if this is damage for you. Although I couldn’t think why it should after all, as Ecuatorian law says clearly that the contents of a letter belongs to the one who has written the letter, and if you don’t allow me to keep the copy, the worse for you if I’m obliged to keep the paper I wrote it on.I write two or three lines still under the heavy influence of anger, and don’t give it a second thought.Later though, I’m invaded by some perplexity. What is the whole box doing in WordPress? I do even show it to the secretary and can’t avoid laughter again. Ruminating for a while, I finally decide to blame Mr Landheim for everything. His e-mails have a strange shape. And while copying a simple mail on WP before, I had remarked that the lines did invade the whole skin’s place, so that long parts became invisible, appearing just at the end of the skin. I had to re edit the whole, in order for it to become readable. Now, Mr Landheim knows about computers. What if he has fumbled with a personal e-mail production center at home, introducing two or three inovations? Copied, they are kept by WP and allow the … theft of the century (if considered like that, because it was completely unvolontary.)Conclusion: if I SAY that functions are copied, please first verify before universal disasters are caused.
Sask is horribly curious to know how I managed to heel a computer from a virus that had attacked the operative system. Now, why it is like that, I don’t know. But I had developed my special antivirus in France 2003 and it was horribly effective. Some sites are securized through a system called (by me) Legifrance. This system does restore always an attacked system at the very moment the damage has occured (Some kind of phoenix bird system). To say: it has a memory that considers all possible ‘heal’ changes. When a function is causing damage, it restores everything at the moment of detection of the ‘ill’ change. As said by Figaro in 2002, the sole fact of keeping two or three documents of such a site (Legifrance, Apce, etc) in a computer does avoid major horrors, but … with care. It will not restore the system, it does just localize the ill functions and pushes them after a while to the temp archives in WINDOWS (for example), where they appear with the little ~, mentioned before. You eliminate these archives and the computer is clean.Strangely, the same effect can be obtained with a laser scanned agata stone. This stone does interact with laser in such a strange way, that the properties kept in a .gif or other extension, does also materialize the viruses in the temp archives, even better than the Legifrance system (the same Microsoft has, yes, Ms Wingsurf). Now do not ask me how it happens, but my computer survived a mortal attack in 2003 this way, with the hilarious effect that the attacking computer (Rothschild) lost fonts and other functions, which did all land in mine (together with their pretended to be sceal).Of course, you don’t have to believe me. Of course, I wouldn’t believe that if I were you. Just continue believing the computer mafia that sells infected programs in order to give jobs to lost of money computer engeneers, and other horrible nightmares of our innocent believe in the righteousness of people. And who of course, will never provide you with correct information. You just pay, as if you were (it’s what they think) a silly ignorant.To solve the question, Mr judge of
California, I don’t believe that an address, which is the property of the state, may never be copyrighted nor severely protected. Or they pay taxes to the owner of the name, which is, Mr Governor, in the name of the Californian people. Of course, if you are Microsoft, you will certainly not want that your extremely expensive protection system serves other computers, too. But this is not my problem. And in any case, there is the agata, too.If you have a little time, give it a try: it’s real fun to hunt viruses! And as long as you don’t commerzialise my idea, you are free to do so. It’s protected by international law through the WP program, isn’t it? You should know it! But only for commercial exploitation.See, how things happen.About viruses, more… next time we are under attack. You happy,
Sask? Should make business me, dear, you Jews have good reputation, and as you can see, I’m not that silly either!!Comments (0)
December 19, 2006
I just needed some kind of proof
Filed under: religion, journalism, Censorship, Philosophy, law, logic, justice, theology, Psychology, Computering, Economy, psychiatry, Jokes and anecdotes, Politics and social organization, undetermined questions related — soniakasten @ 6:20 pm
|
|
|
|
Attempt of sending mail to Microsoft
Spain and Us fails miserably if you want to report total damage on computer caused by virus introduced on screen of official web site. Of course I will go on trying, but I may rather prefer say this way, that sometimes it should be of intelligent to have a working customers services. Before things become public, I mean. Luckily Microsoft will never give importance to our publication means, so that … spread the news! Say thanks for the Security System of Legifrance now happily introduced into WordPress, with permission, I hope?! Estimados Señores, estando escribiendo una carta a Microsoft NC US, concerniendo la asociación del uso del nombre Bill Gates al fundador de Microsoft, pude obtener la dirección de Sillycon Valley a través de la página principal de Microsoft, que copié sobre el documento. Al día siguiente el ordenador estaba infectado, y el virus asociado al documento donde se encontraba la dirección de Microsoft, activo. Fuera que pareciera un virus ni tan siquiera detectable por antivirus lo copié en disquette (fuera para desactivarlo eventualmente). El disquette fue destruido, el intento de reformatearlo para recuperación de datos de importancia para la empresa, ha producido daño total en cinco ordenadores. Puesto que la memoria del disquette guarda el enlace a la página web en cuestión ( a través de las funciones $$$), espero no tener que proceder a mayores denuncias para obtener una reparación del daño. En evidencia me reservo el derecho de publicar el hecho donde me parezca conveniente. Atte. Por orden, Sonja Kasten
|
|
|
|
Buscar en Microsoft.com: |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Administre su perfil |Contacte con nosotros ©2006 Microsoft Corporation. Todos los derechos reservados. Condiciones de uso |Marcas registradas |Declaración de Privacidad |
var msviFooter2; if (document.getElementById) { msviFooter2 = document.getElementById(”msviFooter2″); msviFooter2.style.filter = “”; }
footerjs(document);
cambiaselect2(document.FORM, ‘CAT’, ‘SUBCAT’, valores2, nombres2); Comments (0)
December 17, 2006
Out of conversation with Greg Landheim
Filed under: Computering — soniakasten @ 4:41 pm If you want to participate to this extremely interesting conversation you’re kindly invited to. Although this is rather an excuse, I was really happy that day ….Mail to Landheim:Dear Greg,it’s an evidence that you are not supposed to answer to comments … immediately (although I always do, myself, even if it takes away my working time: but isn’t a social relation some kind of necessary work, too?) In any case I did enjoy the conversation yesterday and will continue posting and posting comments (as they are related to a conversation they better stay there where they are).In any case, you appear now ten thousand times in Google: under Greg Landheim, but also in search Greg Landheim+George Steiner (Isn’t it an honor!), or WP EDITION HOUSE+ Literature, and many other combinations …The best of my successes in my aleatory research was posted yesterday: see under ‘José Serrano+orthography’ it arrived top first today (!) Courts and judges attract as much as numbers, figures and stats. Famous people, too. Post on Betty Catroux managed top first in … less than 12 hours (usually it takes about 24 – 48 hours). Chris Perry appeared after 24 hours (english name with other recurrences), yours after at least three days (german without precedent).Thus, just for the pleasure: if you dedicate poems to ‘x’ let’s say: Governor of Alabama z, or related, your poems will invade the google scene very soon, and that … augmentates viewers from 0 to 100 … Tested! Another tip is to put your name every time under a poem and tag it under a diversity of categories. Say ,Author: Greg Landheim, tags (religion, literature, poetry, thoughts, nature, psychology, family etc dependending on the subject)Best regards,Sonja
Answer Landheim:
Thank you. It has been a pleasure to have helped in your research. I
just googled myself and came up with 1420 hits.
That is amazing. Your hints are likewise very useful. I will give them a
try. I will report back to you the results of any experiments I run, if
You would like.
Because of your English language usage (which you explained) I was never
sure whether you were a crank (brilliant or otherwise), or someone who
is really doing some serious research. Now I see that you are doing
serious research and quite well. Congratulations.
If you every find Solely She, please let me know. She is a fascinating
person.
You seem exactly the sort of guy I’d like to sit with at the coffee shop
or the tavern and solve all the problems of the world and the universe
on a weekly basis. I don’t like to talk to very many people. Where they
aren’t actively trying to keep themselves stupid, they just don’t have
anything interesting to say.
I don’t think you would ever run out of interesting things to say.
It has been a pleasure to meet you.
Cheers!
Greg Landheim
Mail to Landheim:Dear Greg,thank you for your e-mail yesterday. It’s always extremely rewarding to have your work be considered, and to tell you the truth great parts of my strange language is not due to the fact that English is my fifth language, but to some kind of bitter irony coming from the statement that responsible people would not consider my work seriously just because … I’ve studied philosophy. It’s true that actually most philosophers do just tell bullshit, but even computer language is based on the works of logicians and epistemologists, matter that was still taught in 1988/92 at Sorbonne.One of my greatest disappointments has always been (reason why I left for Greece, too) that knowing that there was a logical error in symbolic logic, nobody would mind considering at that time. This error does affect computers in the ALU system (indetermination in the acceptation of ‘ill’ information or virus and proper information.) Abstract thought is horribly difficult. I needed 8 years in order to establish the factual link between the logical error and the actual impact on the working system (even more so as I had no idea of computers as such). When I finally managed to get enough notions on the working system I realized that my way of communicating what I knew was not appropriate to the given environment. My language is a strange attempt of linking philosophical terms to computer language with several bitter touches inside. But that is by the way.Do you know how you can know how many hits you get? I haven’t found out that yet.Best regards,SK Mail to Landheim:
Sonja,
I have to admit I have never studied symbolic logic, so I don’t really
follow what you are doing. Sorry. It sounds interesting.
>
> Do you know how you can know how many hits you get? I haven’t found
> out that yet.
>
Not really.
…
Cheers!
Greg
Mail to Landheim:
Dear Greg,were quite hard days, the past days, and I fished your message from the bulk, luckily, although I don’t know whether I will be able to do anything with it. Seems to be algorithms (?) and maths were never my strong point. (I always thought mathematicians were horribly pretentious, and you always miss fundamental information with affective reactions …) I though had a math course on ‘maths of probability’ at University and I will try to remember (at that time it seemed to me horribly stupidly simple and not worth deeper concentration). I remember vaguely that the possibility of counting hits was mentioned during our logic lessons.If I consider the whole from a logical point of view, it looks like a math formula with a fix variable (x) in combination with one or two undetermined variables (y and z, let us say). As variables can’t be absolutely undetermined (research would be endless), you have to categorize the variables. There are two ways of categorizing variables: through logical categories (Aristotle) and through categories made up through the number of appearances in Google.For 1: the possibility that the word ‘literature’ appears related to a book is very high. If it is a poetry book, the word ‘poetry’ will appear somewhere. Then, depending on the subject, the words ‘family’ ‘religion’ ‘nature’. This categorizing is ‘text’ related, let us say ’subjective’ in objective form.For 2: Google does take care little of general categories of Aristotle. It varies depending on people’s moods or values. It is as possible to have the nouns get up the scale as well as determined adjectives, that are not even categories. I think, these categories can only be established thinking oneself in the situation of a ‘common’ mortal, and further, of a common let us say american, or whatever. Objective counting in subjective disposition.If you conceive a double formula in 1 with one or two variables in categories, and in 2 with one or two variables, you should have the way to get an exhaustive result. I’ll try. Although I’ll have to study the point.…Now, hope you are well in the meantime. If you write anything new, just let me now. SKIf you’re interested in the points of logic, I could give you two or three tips. If you understand about computers you may quickly get the point. PUBLICADO EN ‘SONJAKASTEN1’ tras copiar texto aparecido en splitters21.12.2006
Myself (debe tener inserto funciones de imagen en encabezado)
Makes WordPress cheap publicity
- Home
- Censorship
- Comments
- Economy
- Instructions
- Lust and love
- Metaphysical frame
- Psychology
- Referential authors
- Statistics
- THE LINKS
Response
A French journalist said after having read the article on international right: “This is completely idealistic.” (With a heavy French accent, by the way.) “May be,” I replied, “but contradictions are quite real.”Today 20.12 you can still see this strange technological happening on http://soniakasten.wordpress.com If anyone has an explanation for the event, let him just write a … comment! (Under: ‘I just needed a proof.)Atte. Por orden, Sonja Kasten
|
|
|
|
Buscar en Microsoft.com: |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Administre su perfil |Contacte con nosotros ©2006 Microsoft Corporation. Todos los derechos reservados. Condiciones de uso |Marcas registradas |Declaración de Privacidad |
var msviFooter2; if (document.getElementById) { msviFooter2 = document.getElementById(”msviFooter2″); msviFooter2.style.filter = “”; }
footerjs(document);
cambiaselect2(document.FORM, ‘CAT’, ‘SUBCAT’, valores2, nombres2); Comments (0October 29th, 2006 Posted by sonjakasten1 | technology, Observations, computer, censorship, Computers, Social, Anecdotes, Psychology, Economy, tecnology, Philosophy and religion, Publicity, programms | No Comments PAGINA ‘POST’ WORDPRESS EN ‘MYSELF’ DÍA 21.12.2006Parte del texto antes inserto y publicado en http://soniakasten.wordpress.com, aparece fuera del recuadro del envío, mientras lo no publicado, aun se encuentra ahíTitle Post
|
if ( typeof tinyMCE != “undefined” && tinyMCE.configs.length > 0 ) document.getElementById(‘edButtons’).style.display = ‘block’; edToolbar() if ( typeof tinyMCE != “undefined” && tinyMCE.configs.length > 0 ) document.getElementById(“quicktags”).style.display=”none”; function edInsertContent(myField, myValue) { //IE support if (document.selection) { myField.focus(); sel = document.selection.createRange(); sel.text = myValue; myField.focus(); } //MOZILLA/NETSCAPE support else if (myField.selectionStart || myField.selectionStart == “0″) { var startPos = myField.selectionStart; var endPos = myField.selectionEnd; myField.value = myField.value.substring(0, startPos) + myValue + myField.value.substring(endPos, myField.value.length); myField.focus(); myField.selectionStart = startPos + myValue.length; myField.selectionEnd = startPos + myValue.length; } else { myField.value += myValue; myField.focus(); } } |
Sus datos serán introducidos en nuestro fichero automatizado de datos de carácter personal cuyo responsable es Microsoft Ibérica, S.R.L. con domicilio en Paseo del Club Deportivo, 1, Centro Empresarial
La Finca – Edificio 1, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid). La finalidad del tratamiento de sus datos es la de poder remitirle (siempre a través nuestro) información comercial de su interés, de Microsoft y de otras empresas del sector informático.Usted tiene derecho a acceder, rectificar o cancelar sus datos personales contenidos en dicho fichero. Si usted no desea recibirla, por favor comuníquenoslo indicando claramente su nombre, apellidos y dirección.Para ejercitar sus derechos de oposición, acceso, rectificación y cancelación, por favor póngase en contacto con nuestro Departamento de Atención al Cliente por teléfono en el número [902 197 198], o por fax en el número [91 391 93 00] bien vía web en http://www.microsoft.com/spain/mssrl/Gracias.Última actualización: 23 de mayo de 2005
|
Administre su perfil |Contacte con nosotros ©2006 Microsoft Corporation. Todos los derechos reservados. Condiciones de uso |Marcas registradas |Declaración de Privacidad |
var msviFooter2; if (document.getElementById) { msviFooter2 = document.getElementById(”msviFooter2″); msviFooter2.style.filter = “”; }
footerjs(document);
cambiaselect2(document.FORM, ‘CAT’, ‘SUBCAT’, valores2, nombres2);Comments (0This feature requires iframe support. Optional Excerpt Trackbacks Send trackbacks to: (Separate multiple URIs with spaces) CONTENIDO DEL RECUADRO DE ‘POST’ A French journalist said after having read the article on international right: “This is completely idealistic.” (With a heavy French accent, by the way.) “May be,” I replied, “but contradictions are quite real.”Today 20.12 you can still see this strange technological happening on http://soniakasten.wordpress.com If anyone has an explanation for the event, let him just write a … comment! (Under: ‘I just needed a proof.)Atte. Por orden, Sonja Kasten
|
|
|
|
Buscar en Microsoft.com: |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
PUBLICADO EN ‘SONJAKASTEN1’ tras copiar texto aparecido en splitters21.12.2006
Myself (debe tener inserto funciones de imagen en encabezado)
Makes WordPress cheap publicity
- Home
- Censorship
- Comments
- Economy
- Instructions
- Lust and love
- Metaphysical frame
- Psychology
- Referential authors
- Statistics
- THE LINKS
Response
A French journalist said after having read the article on international right: “This is completely idealistic.” (With a heavy French accent, by the way.) “May be,” I replied, “but contradictions are quite real.”Today 20.12 you can still see this strange technological happening on http://soniakasten.wordpress.com If anyone has an explanation for the event, let him just write a … comment! (Under: ‘I just needed a proof.)Atte. Por orden, Sonja Kasten
|
|
|
|
Buscar en Microsoft.com: |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Administre su perfil |Contacte con nosotros ©2006 Microsoft Corporation. Todos los derechos reservados. Condiciones de uso |Marcas registradas |Declaración de Privacidad |
var msviFooter2; if (document.getElementById) { msviFooter2 = document.getElementById(”msviFooter2″); msviFooter2.style.filter = “”; }
footerjs(document);
cambiaselect2(document.FORM, ‘CAT’, ‘SUBCAT’, valores2, nombres2); Comments (0October 29th, 2006 Posted by sonjakasten1 | technology, Observations, computer, censorship, Computers, Social, Anecdotes, Psychology, Economy, tecnology, Philosophy and religion, Publicity, programms | No Comments PAGINA ‘POST’ WORDPRESS EN ‘MYSELF’ DÍA 21.12.2006Parte del texto antes inserto y publicado en http://soniakasten.wordpress.com, aparece fuera del recuadro del envío, mientras lo no publicado, aun se encuentra ahíTitle Post
|
if ( typeof tinyMCE != “undefined” && tinyMCE.configs.length > 0 ) document.getElementById(‘edButtons’).style.display = ‘block’; edToolbar() if ( typeof tinyMCE != “undefined” && tinyMCE.configs.length > 0 ) document.getElementById(“quicktags”).style.display=”none”; function edInsertContent(myField, myValue) { //IE support if (document.selection) { myField.focus(); sel = document.selection.createRange(); sel.text = myValue; myField.focus(); } //MOZILLA/NETSCAPE support else if (myField.selectionStart || myField.selectionStart == “0″) { var startPos = myField.selectionStart; var endPos = myField.selectionEnd; myField.value = myField.value.substring(0, startPos) + myValue + myField.value.substring(endPos, myField.value.length); myField.focus(); myField.selectionStart = startPos + myValue.length; myField.selectionEnd = startPos + myValue.length; } else { myField.value += myValue; myField.focus(); } } |
Sus datos serán introducidos en nuestro fichero automatizado de datos de carácter personal cuyo responsable es Microsoft Ibérica, S.R.L. con domicilio en Paseo del Club Deportivo, 1, Centro Empresarial
La Finca – Edificio 1, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid). La finalidad del tratamiento de sus datos es la de poder remitirle (siempre a través nuestro) información comercial de su interés, de Microsoft y de otras empresas del sector informático.Usted tiene derecho a acceder, rectificar o cancelar sus datos personales contenidos en dicho fichero. Si usted no desea recibirla, por favor comuníquenoslo indicando claramente su nombre, apellidos y dirección.Para ejercitar sus derechos de oposición, acceso, rectificación y cancelación, por favor póngase en contacto con nuestro Departamento de Atención al Cliente por teléfono en el número [902 197 198], o por fax en el número [91 391 93 00] bien vía web en http://www.microsoft.com/spain/mssrl/Gracias.Última actualización: 23 de mayo de 2005
|
Administre su perfil |Contacte con nosotros ©2006 Microsoft Corporation. Todos los derechos reservados. Condiciones de uso |Marcas registradas |Declaración de Privacidad |
var msviFooter2; if (document.getElementById) { msviFooter2 = document.getElementById(”msviFooter2″); msviFooter2.style.filter = “”; }
footerjs(document);
cambiaselect2(document.FORM, ‘CAT’, ‘SUBCAT’, valores2, nombres2);Comments (0This feature requires iframe support. Optional Excerpt Trackbacks Send trackbacks to: (Separate multiple URIs with spaces) CONTENIDO DEL RECUADRO DE ‘POST’ A French journalist said after having read the article on international right: “This is completely idealistic.” (With a heavy French accent, by the way.) “May be,” I replied, “but contradictions are quite real.”Today 20.12 you can still see this strange technological happening on http://soniakasten.wordpress.com If anyone has an explanation for the event, let him just write a … comment! (Under: ‘I just needed a proof.)Atte. Por orden, Sonja Kasten
|
|
|
|
Buscar en Microsoft.com: |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
Posted December 24, 2006 by bgcentroestudios
Categories: Uncategorized
CONTENIDO DE ‘SPLITTERS’ PUBLICADO EN SONIAKASTEN TAL Y COMO APARECE EL 21.12.2006 TRAS PUBLICACIÓN EL 19.12.2006
Splitters
December 20, 2006
On new technology viruses
Filed under: journalism, justice, Computering, Politics and social organization — soniakasten @ 7:08 pm Yesterday I was really furious. So furious, that it was only after seeing the accident happened by introducing the copy of my mail into WP, that I started laughing and laughing and I almost forgot my anger.What happened really. First, that people who are not worth there titles should definitely be thrown out without second thought, and this, regarding viruses (among many other). As Mr Shrimtico happens not to know what a virus is and he yes he is I don’t know what I don’t know where, of course everyone has to listen to him, even if what he says is bullshit. And this may cause a damage of millions to private and public subjects.ADVICE: before you listen to anyone try to understand what he is saying and after VERIFY! For God’s sake.Many people don’t know that a virus is recognizable because it has the mark of an active function on it. Something like this: ~. This symbol does usually mean that a document is open. When a closed document shows a double with this symbol, it means that one of the functions kept by it contains a virus. The double document has the same name than the original document having introduced the virus. Yesterday I discovered the virus that had come through the Microsoft page. As there are many types of viruses and some very harmful, I thought that perhaps the very fact of eliminating the virus could put it into functioning. Thus, very carefully transporting it from its original place to the bulk and vice versa, I finally decided to copy it on a 31/2 inch disc. The effect was desastruous. The disk was completely destroyed and as it happened that I had several disks on the desk, I took one I thought empty which was full of important documents. From there my fury. I try thus to formate the disk, which has as consequence that the function ‘formate’ in 5 computers is annihilated. To consider the little poison…Quite angry thus I step into an internet café, as I start becoming afraid that a general attack through earth, air and see may not be launched on me. Or the computer. (Sometimes I feel it’s more or less the same, I take aggressions on computers very personally…) To find the address of Microsoft US seems impossible, so that I try with Microsoft
Spain. (These pages are full of spyprograms anyhow, so that must have been staring at each other for a few minutes.) Microsoft
Spain shows at least the possibility of writing in a box under complaints (quejas) (!!) under sub category: virus, which seems to fit my affair quite well. I write thus my letter and am about sending it, when … the idiots want to connect the machine to Outlook Express. So what do you want the box for if you are to send the mail through Outlook and on top you have already asked for my e-mail address? Now, that was enough. After trying once or twice I ask the boy what the devil is the server of the shop and he doesn’t know very well. I try again three or four times and quite fed up, I decide to keep a copy of the letter. And, the function doesn’t work! I start changing color from red to green through purple and say, ok., copy all, and take the page where I have written my message. I paste all into the WordPress blog, thinking of course it will happily just copy my message, and … the whole Microsoft page appears! It was the moment to burst out laughing, and I went out of the shop thinking: you deserve it well, Microsoft, don’t care a shit if this is damage for you. Although I couldn’t think why it should after all, as Ecuatorian law says clearly that the contents of a letter belongs to the one who has written the letter, and if you don’t allow me to keep the copy, the worse for you if I’m obliged to keep the paper I wrote it on.I write two or three lines still under the heavy influence of anger, and don’t give it a second thought.Later though, I’m invaded by some perplexity. What is the whole box doing in WordPress? I do even show it to the secretary and can’t avoid laughter again. Ruminating for a while, I finally decide to blame Mr Landheim for everything. His e-mails have a strange shape. And while copying a simple mail on WP before, I had remarked that the lines did invade the whole skin’s place, so that long parts became invisible, appearing just at the end of the skin. I had to re edit the whole, in order for it to become readable. Now, Mr Landheim knows about computers. What if he has fumbled with a personal e-mail production center at home, introducing two or three inovations? Copied, they are kept by WP and allow the … theft of the century (if considered like that, because it was completely unvolontary.)Conclusion: if I SAY that functions are copied, please first verify before universal disasters are caused.
Sask is horribly curious to know how I managed to heel a computer from a virus that had attacked the operative system. Now, why it is like that, I don’t know. But I had developed my special antivirus in France 2003 and it was horribly effective. Some sites are securized through a system called (by me) Legifrance. This system does restore always an attacked system at the very moment the damage has occured (Some kind of phoenix bird system). To say: it has a memory that considers all possible ‘heal’ changes. When a function is causing damage, it restores everything at the moment of detection of the ‘ill’ change. As said by Figaro in 2002, the sole fact of keeping two or three documents of such a site (Legifrance, Apce, etc) in a computer does avoid major horrors, but … with care. It will not restore the system, it does just localize the ill functions and pushes them after a while to the temp archives in WINDOWS (for example), where they appear with the little ~, mentioned before. You eliminate these archives and the computer is clean.Strangely, the same effect can be obtained with a laser scanned agata stone. This stone does interact with laser in such a strange way, that the properties kept in a .gif or other extension, does also materialize the viruses in the temp archives, even better than the Legifrance system (the same Microsoft has, yes, Ms Wingsurf). Now do not ask me how it happens, but my computer survived a mortal attack in 2003 this way, with the hilarious effect that the attacking computer (Rothschild) lost fonts and other functions, which did all land in mine (together with their pretended to be sceal).Of course, you don’t have to believe me. Of course, I wouldn’t believe that if I were you. Just continue believing the computer mafia that sells infected programs in order to give jobs to lost of money computer engeneers, and other horrible nightmares of our innocent believe in the righteousness of people. And who of course, will never provide you with correct information. You just pay, as if you were (it’s what they think) a silly ignorant.To solve the question, Mr judge of
California, I don’t believe that an address, which is the property of the state, may never be copyrighted nor severely protected. Or they pay taxes to the owner of the name, which is, Mr Governor, in the name of the Californian people. Of course, if you are Microsoft, you will certainly not want that your extremely expensive protection system serves other computers, too. But this is not my problem. And in any case, there is the agata, too.If you have a little time, give it a try: it’s real fun to hunt viruses! And as long as you don’t commerzialise my idea, you are free to do so. It’s protected by international law through the WP program, isn’t it? You should know it! But only for commercial exploitation.See, how things happen.About viruses, more… next time we are under attack. You happy,
Sask? Should make business me, dear, you Jews have good reputation, and as you can see, I’m not that silly either!!Comments (0)
December 19, 2006
I just needed some kind of proof
Filed under: religion, journalism, Censorship, Philosophy, law, logic, justice, theology, Psychology, Computering, Economy, psychiatry, Jokes and anecdotes, Politics and social organization, undetermined questions related — soniakasten @ 6:20 pm
|
|
|
|
Attempt of sending mail to Microsoft
Spain and Us fails miserably if you want to report total damage on computer caused by virus introduced on screen of official web site. Of course I will go on trying, but I may rather prefer say this way, that sometimes it should be of intelligent to have a working customers services. Before things become public, I mean. Luckily Microsoft will never give importance to our publication means, so that … spread the news! Say thanks for the Security System of Legifrance now happily introduced into WordPress, with permission, I hope?! Estimados Señores, estando escribiendo una carta a Microsoft NC US, concerniendo la asociación del uso del nombre Bill Gates al fundador de Microsoft, pude obtener la dirección de Sillycon Valley a través de la página principal de Microsoft, que copié sobre el documento. Al día siguiente el ordenador estaba infectado, y el virus asociado al documento donde se encontraba la dirección de Microsoft, activo. Fuera que pareciera un virus ni tan siquiera detectable por antivirus lo copié en disquette (fuera para desactivarlo eventualmente). El disquette fue destruido, el intento de reformatearlo para recuperación de datos de importancia para la empresa, ha producido daño total en cinco ordenadores. Puesto que la memoria del disquette guarda el enlace a la página web en cuestión ( a través de las funciones $$$), espero no tener que proceder a mayores denuncias para obtener una reparación del daño. En evidencia me reservo el derecho de publicar el hecho donde me parezca conveniente. Atte. Por orden, Sonja Kasten
|
|
|
|
Buscar en Microsoft.com: |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Administre su perfil |Contacte con nosotros ©2006 Microsoft Corporation. Todos los derechos reservados. Condiciones de uso |Marcas registradas |Declaración de Privacidad |
var msviFooter2; if (document.getElementById) { msviFooter2 = document.getElementById(”msviFooter2″); msviFooter2.style.filter = “”; }
footerjs(document);
cambiaselect2(document.FORM, ‘CAT’, ‘SUBCAT’, valores2, nombres2); Comments (0)
December 17, 2006
Out of conversation with Greg Landheim
Filed under: Computering — soniakasten @ 4:41 pm If you want to participate to this extremely interesting conversation you’re kindly invited to. Although this is rather an excuse, I was really happy that day ….Mail to Landheim:Dear Greg,it’s an evidence that you are not supposed to answer to comments … immediately (although I always do, myself, even if it takes away my working time: but isn’t a social relation some kind of necessary work, too?) In any case I did enjoy the conversation yesterday and will continue posting and posting comments (as they are related to a conversation they better stay there where they are).In any case, you appear now ten thousand times in Google: under Greg Landheim, but also in search Greg Landheim+George Steiner (Isn’t it an honor!), or WP EDITION HOUSE+ Literature, and many other combinations …The best of my successes in my aleatory research was posted yesterday: see under ‘José Serrano+orthography’ it arrived top first today (!) Courts and judges attract as much as numbers, figures and stats. Famous people, too. Post on Betty Catroux managed top first in … less than 12 hours (usually it takes about 24 – 48 hours). Chris Perry appeared after 24 hours (english name with other recurrences), yours after at least three days (german without precedent).Thus, just for the pleasure: if you dedicate poems to ‘x’ let’s say: Governor of Alabama z, or related, your poems will invade the google scene very soon, and that … augmentates viewers from 0 to 100 … Tested! Another tip is to put your name every time under a poem and tag it under a diversity of categories. Say ,Author: Greg Landheim, tags (religion, literature, poetry, thoughts, nature, psychology, family etc dependending on the subject)Best regards,Sonja
Answer Landheim:
Thank you. It has been a pleasure to have helped in your research. I
just googled myself and came up with 1420 hits.
That is amazing. Your hints are likewise very useful. I will give them a
try. I will report back to you the results of any experiments I run, if
You would like.
Because of your English language usage (which you explained) I was never
sure whether you were a crank (brilliant or otherwise), or someone who
is really doing some serious research. Now I see that you are doing
serious research and quite well. Congratulations.
If you every find Solely She, please let me know. She is a fascinating
person.
You seem exactly the sort of guy I’d like to sit with at the coffee shop
or the tavern and solve all the problems of the world and the universe
on a weekly basis. I don’t like to talk to very many people. Where they
aren’t actively trying to keep themselves stupid, they just don’t have
anything interesting to say.
I don’t think you would ever run out of interesting things to say.
It has been a pleasure to meet you.
Cheers!
Greg Landheim
Mail to Landheim:Dear Greg,thank you for your e-mail yesterday. It’s always extremely rewarding to have your work be considered, and to tell you the truth great parts of my strange language is not due to the fact that English is my fifth language, but to some kind of bitter irony coming from the statement that responsible people would not consider my work seriously just because … I’ve studied philosophy. It’s true that actually most philosophers do just tell bullshit, but even computer language is based on the works of logicians and epistemologists, matter that was still taught in 1988/92 at Sorbonne.One of my greatest disappointments has always been (reason why I left for Greece, too) that knowing that there was a logical error in symbolic logic, nobody would mind considering at that time. This error does affect computers in the ALU system (indetermination in the acceptation of ‘ill’ information or virus and proper information.) Abstract thought is horribly difficult. I needed 8 years in order to establish the factual link between the logical error and the actual impact on the working system (even more so as I had no idea of computers as such). When I finally managed to get enough notions on the working system I realized that my way of communicating what I knew was not appropriate to the given environment. My language is a strange attempt of linking philosophical terms to computer language with several bitter touches inside. But that is by the way.Do you know how you can know how many hits you get? I haven’t found out that yet.Best regards,SK Mail to Landheim:
Sonja,
I have to admit I have never studied symbolic logic, so I don’t really
follow what you are doing. Sorry. It sounds interesting.
>
> Do you know how you can know how many hits you get? I haven’t found
> out that yet.
>
Not really.
…
Cheers!
Greg
Mail to Landheim:
Dear Greg,were quite hard days, the past days, and I fished your message from the bulk, luckily, although I don’t know whether I will be able to do anything with it. Seems to be algorithms (?) and maths were never my strong point. (I always thought mathematicians were horribly pretentious, and you always miss fundamental information with affective reactions …) I though had a math course on ‘maths of probability’ at University and I will try to remember (at that time it seemed to me horribly stupidly simple and not worth deeper concentration). I remember vaguely that the possibility of counting hits was mentioned during our logic lessons.If I consider the whole from a logical point of view, it looks like a math formula with a fix variable (x) in combination with one or two undetermined variables (y and z, let us say). As variables can’t be absolutely undetermined (research would be endless), you have to categorize the variables. There are two ways of categorizing variables: through logical categories (Aristotle) and through categories made up through the number of appearances in Google.For 1: the possibility that the word ‘literature’ appears related to a book is very high. If it is a poetry book, the word ‘poetry’ will appear somewhere. Then, depending on the subject, the words ‘family’ ‘religion’ ‘nature’. This categorizing is ‘text’ related, let us say ’subjective’ in objective form.For 2: Google does take care little of general categories of Aristotle. It varies depending on people’s moods or values. It is as possible to have the nouns get up the scale as well as determined adjectives, that are not even categories. I think, these categories can only be established thinking oneself in the situation of a ‘common’ mortal, and further, of a common let us say american, or whatever. Objective counting in subjective disposition.If you conceive a double formula in 1 with one or two variables in categories, and in 2 with one or two variables, you should have the way to get an exhaustive result. I’ll try. Although I’ll have to study the point.…Now, hope you are well in the meantime. If you write anything new, just let me now. SKIf you’re interested in the points of logic, I could give you two or three tips. If you understand about computers you may quickly get the point. PUBLICADO EN ‘SONJAKASTEN1’ tras copiar texto aparecido en splitters21.12.2006
Myself (debe tener inserto funciones de imagen en encabezado)
Makes WordPress cheap publicity
- Home
- Censorship
- Comments
- Economy
- Instructions
- Lust and love
- Metaphysical frame
- Psychology
- Referential authors
- Statistics
- THE LINKS
Response
A French journalist said after having read the article on international right: “This is completely idealistic.” (With a heavy French accent, by the way.) “May be,” I replied, “but contradictions are quite real.”Today 20.12 you can still see this strange technological happening on http://soniakasten.wordpress.com If anyone has an explanation for the event, let him just write a … comment! (Under: ‘I just needed a proof.)Atte. Por orden, Sonja Kasten
|
|
|
|
Buscar en Microsoft.com: |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Administre su perfil |Contacte con nosotros ©2006 Microsoft Corporation. Todos los derechos reservados. Condiciones de uso |Marcas registradas |Declaración de Privacidad |
var msviFooter2; if (document.getElementById) { msviFooter2 = document.getElementById(”msviFooter2″); msviFooter2.style.filter = “”; }
footerjs(document);
cambiaselect2(document.FORM, ‘CAT’, ‘SUBCAT’, valores2, nombres2); Comments (0October 29th, 2006 Posted by sonjakasten1 | technology, Observations, computer, censorship, Computers, Social, Anecdotes, Psychology, Economy, tecnology, Philosophy and religion, Publicity, programms | No Comments PAGINA ‘POST’ WORDPRESS EN ‘MYSELF’ DÍA 21.12.2006Parte del texto antes inserto y publicado en http://soniakasten.wordpress.com, aparece fuera del recuadro del envío, mientras lo no publicado, aun se encuentra ahíTitle Post
|
if ( typeof tinyMCE != “undefined” && tinyMCE.configs.length > 0 ) document.getElementById(‘edButtons’).style.display = ‘block’; edToolbar() if ( typeof tinyMCE != “undefined” && tinyMCE.configs.length > 0 ) document.getElementById(“quicktags”).style.display=”none”; function edInsertContent(myField, myValue) { //IE support if (document.selection) { myField.focus(); sel = document.selection.createRange(); sel.text = myValue; myField.focus(); } //MOZILLA/NETSCAPE support else if (myField.selectionStart || myField.selectionStart == “0″) { var startPos = myField.selectionStart; var endPos = myField.selectionEnd; myField.value = myField.value.substring(0, startPos) + myValue + myField.value.substring(endPos, myField.value.length); myField.focus(); myField.selectionStart = startPos + myValue.length; myField.selectionEnd = startPos + myValue.length; } else { myField.value += myValue; myField.focus(); } } |
Sus datos serán introducidos en nuestro fichero automatizado de datos de carácter personal cuyo responsable es Microsoft Ibérica, S.R.L. con domicilio en Paseo del Club Deportivo, 1, Centro Empresarial
La Finca – Edificio 1, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid). La finalidad del tratamiento de sus datos es la de poder remitirle (siempre a través nuestro) información comercial de su interés, de Microsoft y de otras empresas del sector informático.Usted tiene derecho a acceder, rectificar o cancelar sus datos personales contenidos en dicho fichero. Si usted no desea recibirla, por favor comuníquenoslo indicando claramente su nombre, apellidos y dirección.Para ejercitar sus derechos de oposición, acceso, rectificación y cancelación, por favor póngase en contacto con nuestro Departamento de Atención al Cliente por teléfono en el número [902 197 198], o por fax en el número [91 391 93 00] bien vía web en http://www.microsoft.com/spain/mssrl/Gracias.Última actualización: 23 de mayo de 2005
|
Administre su perfil |Contacte con nosotros ©2006 Microsoft Corporation. Todos los derechos reservados. Condiciones de uso |Marcas registradas |Declaración de Privacidad |
var msviFooter2; if (document.getElementById) { msviFooter2 = document.getElementById(”msviFooter2″); msviFooter2.style.filter = “”; }
footerjs(document);
cambiaselect2(document.FORM, ‘CAT’, ‘SUBCAT’, valores2, nombres2);Comments (0This feature requires iframe support. Optional Excerpt Trackbacks Send trackbacks to: (Separate multiple URIs with spaces) CONTENIDO DEL RECUADRO DE ‘POST’ A French journalist said after having read the article on international right: “This is completely idealistic.” (With a heavy French accent, by the way.) “May be,” I replied, “but contradictions are quite real.”Today 20.12 you can still see this strange technological happening on http://soniakasten.wordpress.com If anyone has an explanation for the event, let him just write a … comment! (Under: ‘I just needed a proof.)Atte. Por orden, Sonja Kasten
|
|
|
|
Buscar en Microsoft.com: |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
PUBLICADO EN ‘SONJAKASTEN1’ tras copiar texto aparecido en splitters21.12.2006
Myself (debe tener inserto funciones de imagen en encabezado)
Makes WordPress cheap publicity
- Home
- Censorship
- Comments
- Economy
- Instructions
- Lust and love
- Metaphysical frame
- Psychology
- Referential authors
- Statistics
- THE LINKS
Response
A French journalist said after having read the article on international right: “This is completely idealistic.” (With a heavy French accent, by the way.) “May be,” I replied, “but contradictions are quite real.”Today 20.12 you can still see this strange technological happening on http://soniakasten.wordpress.com If anyone has an explanation for the event, let him just write a … comment! (Under: ‘I just needed a proof.)Atte. Por orden, Sonja Kasten
|
|
|
|
Buscar en Microsoft.com: |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Administre su perfil |Contacte con nosotros ©2006 Microsoft Corporation. Todos los derechos reservados. Condiciones de uso |Marcas registradas |Declaración de Privacidad |
var msviFooter2; if (document.getElementById) { msviFooter2 = document.getElementById(”msviFooter2″); msviFooter2.style.filter = “”; }
footerjs(document);
cambiaselect2(document.FORM, ‘CAT’, ‘SUBCAT’, valores2, nombres2); Comments (0October 29th, 2006 Posted by sonjakasten1 | technology, Observations, computer, censorship, Computers, Social, Anecdotes, Psychology, Economy, tecnology, Philosophy and religion, Publicity, programms | No Comments PAGINA ‘POST’ WORDPRESS EN ‘MYSELF’ DÍA 21.12.2006Parte del texto antes inserto y publicado en http://soniakasten.wordpress.com, aparece fuera del recuadro del envío, mientras lo no publicado, aun se encuentra ahíTitle Post
|
if ( typeof tinyMCE != “undefined” && tinyMCE.configs.length > 0 ) document.getElementById(‘edButtons’).style.display = ‘block’; edToolbar() if ( typeof tinyMCE != “undefined” && tinyMCE.configs.length > 0 ) document.getElementById(“quicktags”).style.display=”none”; function edInsertContent(myField, myValue) { //IE support if (document.selection) { myField.focus(); sel = document.selection.createRange(); sel.text = myValue; myField.focus(); } //MOZILLA/NETSCAPE support else if (myField.selectionStart || myField.selectionStart == “0″) { var startPos = myField.selectionStart; var endPos = myField.selectionEnd; myField.value = myField.value.substring(0, startPos) + myValue + myField.value.substring(endPos, myField.value.length); myField.focus(); myField.selectionStart = startPos + myValue.length; myField.selectionEnd = startPos + myValue.length; } else { myField.value += myValue; myField.focus(); } } |
Sus datos serán introducidos en nuestro fichero automatizado de datos de carácter personal cuyo responsable es Microsoft Ibérica, S.R.L. con domicilio en Paseo del Club Deportivo, 1, Centro Empresarial
La Finca – Edificio 1, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid). La finalidad del tratamiento de sus datos es la de poder remitirle (siempre a través nuestro) información comercial de su interés, de Microsoft y de otras empresas del sector informático.Usted tiene derecho a acceder, rectificar o cancelar sus datos personales contenidos en dicho fichero. Si usted no desea recibirla, por favor comuníquenoslo indicando claramente su nombre, apellidos y dirección.Para ejercitar sus derechos de oposición, acceso, rectificación y cancelación, por favor póngase en contacto con nuestro Departamento de Atención al Cliente por teléfono en el número [902 197 198], o por fax en el número [91 391 93 00] bien vía web en http://www.microsoft.com/spain/mssrl/Gracias.Última actualización: 23 de mayo de 2005
|
Administre su perfil |Contacte con nosotros ©2006 Microsoft Corporation. Todos los derechos reservados. Condiciones de uso |Marcas registradas |Declaración de Privacidad |
var msviFooter2; if (document.getElementById) { msviFooter2 = document.getElementById(”msviFooter2″); msviFooter2.style.filter = “”; }
footerjs(document);
cambiaselect2(document.FORM, ‘CAT’, ‘SUBCAT’, valores2, nombres2);Comments (0This feature requires iframe support. Optional Excerpt Trackbacks Send trackbacks to: (Separate multiple URIs with spaces) CONTENIDO DEL RECUADRO DE ‘POST’ A French journalist said after having read the article on international right: “This is completely idealistic.” (With a heavy French accent, by the way.) “May be,” I replied, “but contradictions are quite real.”Today 20.12 you can still see this strange technological happening on http://soniakasten.wordpress.com If anyone has an explanation for the event, let him just write a … comment! (Under: ‘I just needed a proof.)Atte. Por orden, Sonja Kasten
|
|
|
|
Buscar en Microsoft.com: |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
Posted December 24, 2006 by bgcentroestudios
Categories: Uncategorized
CONTENIDO DE ‘SPLITTERS’ PUBLICADO EN SONIAKASTEN TAL Y COMO APARECE EL 21.12.2006 TRAS PUBLICACIÓN EL 19.12.2006
Splitters
December 20, 2006
On new technology viruses
Filed under: journalism, justice, Computering, Politics and social organization — soniakasten @ 7:08 pm Yesterday I was really furious. So furious, that it was only after seeing the accident happened by introducing the copy of my mail into WP, that I started laughing and laughing and I almost forgot my anger.What happened really. First, that people who are not worth there titles should definitely be thrown out without second thought, and this, regarding viruses (among many other). As Mr Shrimtico happens not to know what a virus is and he yes he is I don’t know what I don’t know where, of course everyone has to listen to him, even if what he says is bullshit. And this may cause a damage of millions to private and public subjects.ADVICE: before you listen to anyone try to understand what he is saying and after VERIFY! For God’s sake.Many people don’t know that a virus is recognizable because it has the mark of an active function on it. Something like this: ~. This symbol does usually mean that a document is open. When a closed document shows a double with this symbol, it means that one of the functions kept by it contains a virus. The double document has the same name than the original document having introduced the virus. Yesterday I discovered the virus that had come through the Microsoft page. As there are many types of viruses and some very harmful, I thought that perhaps the very fact of eliminating the virus could put it into functioning. Thus, very carefully transporting it from its original place to the bulk and vice versa, I finally decided to copy it on a 31/2 inch disc. The effect was desastruous. The disk was completely destroyed and as it happened that I had several disks on the desk, I took one I thought empty which was full of important documents. From there my fury. I try thus to formate the disk, which has as consequence that the function ‘formate’ in 5 computers is annihilated. To consider the little poison…Quite angry thus I step into an internet café, as I start becoming afraid that a general attack through earth, air and see may not be launched on me. Or the computer. (Sometimes I feel it’s more or less the same, I take aggressions on computers very personally…) To find the address of Microsoft US seems impossible, so that I try with Microsoft
Spain. (These pages are full of spyprograms anyhow, so that must have been staring at each other for a few minutes.) Microsoft
Spain shows at least the possibility of writing in a box under complaints (quejas) (!!) under sub category: virus, which seems to fit my affair quite well. I write thus my letter and am about sending it, when … the idiots want to connect the machine to Outlook Express. So what do you want the box for if you are to send the mail through Outlook and on top you have already asked for my e-mail address? Now, that was enough. After trying once or twice I ask the boy what the devil is the server of the shop and he doesn’t know very well. I try again three or four times and quite fed up, I decide to keep a copy of the letter. And, the function doesn’t work! I start changing color from red to green through purple and say, ok., copy all, and take the page where I have written my message. I paste all into the WordPress blog, thinking of course it will happily just copy my message, and … the whole Microsoft page appears! It was the moment to burst out laughing, and I went out of the shop thinking: you deserve it well, Microsoft, don’t care a shit if this is damage for you. Although I couldn’t think why it should after all, as Ecuatorian law says clearly that the contents of a letter belongs to the one who has written the letter, and if you don’t allow me to keep the copy, the worse for you if I’m obliged to keep the paper I wrote it on.I write two or three lines still under the heavy influence of anger, and don’t give it a second thought.Later though, I’m invaded by some perplexity. What is the whole box doing in WordPress? I do even show it to the secretary and can’t avoid laughter again. Ruminating for a while, I finally decide to blame Mr Landheim for everything. His e-mails have a strange shape. And while copying a simple mail on WP before, I had remarked that the lines did invade the whole skin’s place, so that long parts became invisible, appearing just at the end of the skin. I had to re edit the whole, in order for it to become readable. Now, Mr Landheim knows about computers. What if he has fumbled with a personal e-mail production center at home, introducing two or three inovations? Copied, they are kept by WP and allow the … theft of the century (if considered like that, because it was completely unvolontary.)Conclusion: if I SAY that functions are copied, please first verify before universal disasters are caused.
Sask is horribly curious to know how I managed to heel a computer from a virus that had attacked the operative system. Now, why it is like that, I don’t know. But I had developed my special antivirus in France 2003 and it was horribly effective. Some sites are securized through a system called (by me) Legifrance. This system does restore always an attacked system at the very moment the damage has occured (Some kind of phoenix bird system). To say: it has a memory that considers all possible ‘heal’ changes. When a function is causing damage, it restores everything at the moment of detection of the ‘ill’ change. As said by Figaro in 2002, the sole fact of keeping two or three documents of such a site (Legifrance, Apce, etc) in a computer does avoid major horrors, but … with care. It will not restore the system, it does just localize the ill functions and pushes them after a while to the temp archives in WINDOWS (for example), where they appear with the little ~, mentioned before. You eliminate these archives and the computer is clean.Strangely, the same effect can be obtained with a laser scanned agata stone. This stone does interact with laser in such a strange way, that the properties kept in a .gif or other extension, does also materialize the viruses in the temp archives, even better than the Legifrance system (the same Microsoft has, yes, Ms Wingsurf). Now do not ask me how it happens, but my computer survived a mortal attack in 2003 this way, with the hilarious effect that the attacking computer (Rothschild) lost fonts and other functions, which did all land in mine (together with their pretended to be sceal).Of course, you don’t have to believe me. Of course, I wouldn’t believe that if I were you. Just continue believing the computer mafia that sells infected programs in order to give jobs to lost of money computer engeneers, and other horrible nightmares of our innocent believe in the righteousness of people. And who of course, will never provide you with correct information. You just pay, as if you were (it’s what they think) a silly ignorant.To solve the question, Mr judge of
California, I don’t believe that an address, which is the property of the state, may never be copyrighted nor severely protected. Or they pay taxes to the owner of the name, which is, Mr Governor, in the name of the Californian people. Of course, if you are Microsoft, you will certainly not want that your extremely expensive protection system serves other computers, too. But this is not my problem. And in any case, there is the agata, too.If you have a little time, give it a try: it’s real fun to hunt viruses! And as long as you don’t commerzialise my idea, you are free to do so. It’s protected by international law through the WP program, isn’t it? You should know it! But only for commercial exploitation.See, how things happen.About viruses, more… next time we are under attack. You happy,
Sask? Should make business me, dear, you Jews have good reputation, and as you can see, I’m not that silly either!!Comments (0)
December 19, 2006
I just needed some kind of proof
Filed under: religion, journalism, Censorship, Philosophy, law, logic, justice, theology, Psychology, Computering, Economy, psychiatry, Jokes and anecdotes, Politics and social organization, undetermined questions related — soniakasten @ 6:20 pm
|
|
|
|
Attempt of sending mail to Microsoft
Spain and Us fails miserably if you want to report total damage on computer caused by virus introduced on screen of official web site. Of course I will go on trying, but I may rather prefer say this way, that sometimes it should be of intelligent to have a working customers services. Before things become public, I mean. Luckily Microsoft will never give importance to our publication means, so that … spread the news! Say thanks for the Security System of Legifrance now happily introduced into WordPress, with permission, I hope?! Estimados Señores,
estando escribiendo una carta a Microsoft NC US, concerniendo la asociación del uso del nombre Bill Gates al fundador de Microsoft, pude obtener la dirección de Sillycon Valley a través de la página principal de Microsoft, que copié sobre el documento.
Al día siguiente el ordenador estaba infectado, y el virus asociado al documento donde se encontraba la dirección de Microsoft, activo. Fuera que pareciera un virus ni tan siquiera detectable por antivirus lo copié en disquette (fuera para desactivarlo eventualmente). El disquette fue destruido, el intento de reformatearlo para recuperación de datos de importancia para la empresa, ha producido daño total en cinco ordenadores.
Puesto que la memoria del disquette guarda el enlace a la página web en cuestión ( a través de las funciones $$$), espero no tener que proceder a mayores denuncias para obtener una reparación del daño.
En evidencia me reservo el derecho de publicar el hecho donde me parezca conveniente.
Atte.
Por orden,
Sonja Kasten
|
|
|
|
Buscar en Microsoft.com: |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Administre su perfil |Contacte con nosotros
©2006 Microsoft Corporation. Todos los derechos reservados. Condiciones de uso |Marcas registradas |Declaración de Privacidad |
var msviFooter2; if (document.getElementById) { msviFooter2 = document.getElementById(”msviFooter2″); msviFooter2.style.filter = “”; }
footerjs(document);
cambiaselect2(document.FORM, ‘CAT’, ‘SUBCAT’, valores2, nombres2);
December 17, 2006
Out of conversation with Greg Landheim
Filed under: Computering — soniakasten @ 4:41 pm If you want to participate to this extremely interesting conversation you’re kindly invited to. Although this is rather an excuse, I was really happy that day ….Mail to Landheim:Dear Greg,it’s an evidence that you are not supposed to answer to comments … immediately (although I always do, myself, even if it takes away my working time: but isn’t a social relation some kind of necessary work, too?) In any case I did enjoy the conversation yesterday and will continue posting and posting comments (as they are related to a conversation they better stay there where they are).In any case, you appear now ten thousand times in Google: under Greg Landheim, but also in search Greg Landheim+George Steiner (Isn’t it an honor!), or WP EDITION HOUSE+ Literature, and many other combinations …The best of my successes in my aleatory research was posted yesterday: see under ‘José Serrano+orthography’ it arrived top first today (!) Courts and judges attract as much as numbers, figures and stats. Famous people, too. Post on Betty Catroux managed top first in … less than 12 hours (usually it takes about 24 – 48 hours). Chris Perry appeared after 24 hours (english name with other recurrences), yours after at least three days (german without precedent).Thus, just for the pleasure: if you dedicate poems to ‘x’ let’s say: Governor of Alabama z, or related, your poems will invade the google scene very soon, and that … augmentates viewers from 0 to 100 … Tested! Another tip is to put your name every time under a poem and tag it under a diversity of categories. Say ,Author: Greg Landheim, tags (religion, literature, poetry, thoughts, nature, psychology, family etc dependending on the subject)Best regards,Sonja
Answer Landheim:
Thank you. It has been a pleasure to have helped in your research. I
just googled myself and came up with 1420 hits.
That is amazing. Your hints are likewise very useful. I will give them a
try. I will report back to you the results of any experiments I run, if
You would like.
Because of your English language usage (which you explained) I was never
sure whether you were a crank (brilliant or otherwise), or someone who
is really doing some serious research. Now I see that you are doing
serious research and quite well. Congratulations.
If you every find Solely She, please let me know. She is a fascinating
person.
You seem exactly the sort of guy I’d like to sit with at the coffee shop
or the tavern and solve all the problems of the world and the universe
on a weekly basis. I don’t like to talk to very many people. Where they
aren’t actively trying to keep themselves stupid, they just don’t have
anything interesting to say.
I don’t think you would ever run out of interesting things to say.
It has been a pleasure to meet you.
Cheers!
Greg Landheim
Mail to Landheim:Dear Greg,thank you for your e-mail yesterday. It’s always extremely rewarding to have your work be considered, and to tell you the truth great parts of my strange language is not due to the fact that English is my fifth language, but to some kind of bitter irony coming from the statement that responsible people would not consider my work seriously just because … I’ve studied philosophy. It’s true that actually most philosophers do just tell bullshit, but even computer language is based on the works of logicians and epistemologists, matter that was still taught in 1988/92 at Sorbonne.One of my greatest disappointments has always been (reason why I left for
Greece, too) that knowing that there was a logical error in symbolic logic, nobody would mind considering at that time. This error does affect computers in the ALU system (indetermination in the acceptation of ‘ill’ information or virus and proper information.) Abstract thought is horribly difficult. I needed 8 years in order to establish the factual link between the logical error and the actual impact on the working system (even more so as I had no idea of computers as such). When I finally managed to get enough notions on the working system I realized that my way of communicating what I knew was not appropriate to the given environment. My language is a strange attempt of linking philosophical terms to computer language with several bitter touches inside. But that is by the way.Do you know how you can know how many hits you get? I haven’t found out that yet.Best regards,SK Mail to Landheim:
Sonja,
I have to admit I have never studied symbolic logic, so I don’t really
follow what you are doing. Sorry. It sounds interesting.
>
> Do you know how you can know how many hits you get? I haven’t found
> out that yet.
>
Not really.
…
Cheers!
Greg
Mail to Landheim:
Dear Greg,were quite hard days, the past days, and I fished your message from the bulk, luckily, although I don’t know whether I will be able to do anything with it. Seems to be algorithms (?) and maths were never my strong point. (I always thought mathematicians were horribly pretentious, and you always miss fundamental information with affective reactions …) I though had a math course on ‘maths of probability’ at University and I will try to remember (at that time it seemed to me horribly stupidly simple and not worth deeper concentration). I remember vaguely that the possibility of counting hits was mentioned during our logic lessons.If I consider the whole from a logical point of view, it looks like a math formula with a fix variable (x) in combination with one or two undetermined variables (y and z, let us say). As variables can’t be absolutely undetermined (research would be endless), you have to categorize the variables. There are two ways of categorizing variables: through logical categories (Aristotle) and through categories made up through the number of appearances in Google.For 1: the possibility that the word ‘literature’ appears related to a book is very high. If it is a poetry book, the word ‘poetry’ will appear somewhere. Then, depending on the subject, the words ‘family’ ‘religion’ ‘nature’. This categorizing is ‘text’ related, let us say ’subjective’ in objective form.For 2: Google does take care little of general categories of Aristotle. It varies depending on people’s moods or values. It is as possible to have the nouns get up the scale as well as determined adjectives, that are not even categories. I think, these categories can only be established thinking oneself in the situation of a ‘common’ mortal, and further, of a common let us say american, or whatever. Objective counting in subjective disposition.If you conceive a double formula in 1 with one or two variables in categories, and in 2 with one or two variables, you should have the way to get an exhaustive result. I’ll try. Although I’ll have to study the point.…Now, hope you are well in the meantime. If you write anything new, just let me now. SKIf you’re interested in the points of logic, I could give you two or three tips. If you understand about computers you may quickly get the point.
PUBLICADO EN ‘SONJAKASTEN1’ tras copiar texto aparecido en splitters21.12.2006
Myself (debe tener inserto funciones de imagen en encabezado)
Makes WordPress cheap publicity
- Home
- Censorship
- Comments
- Economy
- Instructions
- Lust and love
- Metaphysical frame
- Psychology
- Referential authors
- Statistics
- THE LINKS
Response
A French journalist said after having read the article on international right: “This is completely idealistic.” (With a heavy French accent, by the way.) “May be,” I replied, “but contradictions are quite real.”Today 20.12 you can still see this strange technological happening on http://soniakasten.wordpress.com If anyone has an explanation for the event, let him just write a … comment! (Under: ‘I just needed a proof.)Atte.
Por orden,
Sonja Kasten
|
|
|
|
Buscar en Microsoft.com: |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Administre su perfil |Contacte con nosotros ©2006 Microsoft Corporation. Todos los derechos reservados. Condiciones de uso |Marcas registradas |Declaración de Privacidad |
var msviFooter2; if (document.getElementById) { msviFooter2 = document.getElementById(”msviFooter2″); msviFooter2.style.filter = “”; }
footerjs(document);
cambiaselect2(document.FORM, ‘CAT’, ‘SUBCAT’, valores2, nombres2);
Comments (0October 29th, 2006 Posted by sonjakasten1 | technology, Observations, computer, censorship, Computers, Social, Anecdotes, Psychology, Economy, tecnology, Philosophy and religion, Publicity, programms | No Comments
PAGINA ‘POST’ WORDPRESS EN ‘MYSELF’ DÍA 21.12.2006Parte del texto antes inserto y publicado en http://soniakasten.wordpress.com, aparece fuera del recuadro del envío, mientras lo no publicado, aun se encuentra ahíTitle
Post
|
if ( typeof tinyMCE != “undefined” && tinyMCE.configs.length > 0 ) document.getElementById(‘edButtons’).style.display = ‘block’; edToolbar() if ( typeof tinyMCE != “undefined” && tinyMCE.configs.length > 0 ) document.getElementById(“quicktags”).style.display=”none”; function edInsertContent(myField, myValue) { //IE support if (document.selection) { myField.focus(); sel = document.selection.createRange(); sel.text = myValue; myField.focus(); } //MOZILLA/NETSCAPE support else if (myField.selectionStart || myField.selectionStart == “0″) { var startPos = myField.selectionStart; var endPos = myField.selectionEnd; myField.value = myField.value.substring(0, startPos) + myValue + myField.value.substring(endPos, myField.value.length); myField.focus(); myField.selectionStart = startPos + myValue.length; myField.selectionEnd = startPos + myValue.length; } else { myField.value += myValue; myField.focus(); } }
|
Sus datos serán introducidos en nuestro fichero automatizado de datos de carácter personal cuyo responsable es Microsoft Ibérica, S.R.L. con domicilio en Paseo del Club Deportivo, 1, Centro Empresarial
La Finca – Edificio 1, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid). La finalidad del tratamiento de sus datos es la de poder remitirle (siempre a través nuestro) información comercial de su interés, de Microsoft y de otras empresas del sector informático.Usted tiene derecho a acceder, rectificar o cancelar sus datos personales contenidos en dicho fichero. Si usted no desea recibirla, por favor comuníquenoslo indicando claramente su nombre, apellidos y dirección.Para ejercitar sus derechos de oposición, acceso, rectificación y cancelación, por favor póngase en contacto con nuestro Departamento de Atención al Cliente por teléfono en el número [902 197 198], o por fax en el número [91 391 93 00] bien vía web en http://www.microsoft.com/spain/mssrl/Gracias.Última actualización: 23 de mayo de 2005
|
Administre su perfil |Contacte con nosotros ©2006 Microsoft Corporation. Todos los derechos reservados. Condiciones de uso |Marcas registradas |Declaración de Privacidad |
var msviFooter2; if (document.getElementById) { msviFooter2 = document.getElementById(”msviFooter2″); msviFooter2.style.filter = “”; }
footerjs(document);
cambiaselect2(document.FORM, ‘CAT’, ‘SUBCAT’, valores2, nombres2);Comments (0This feature requires iframe support. Optional Excerpt Trackbacks Send trackbacks to: (Separate multiple URIs with spaces)
CONTENIDO DEL RECUADRO DE ‘POST’
A French journalist said after having read the article on international right: “This is completely idealistic.” (With a heavy French accent, by the way.) “May be,” I replied, “but contradictions are quite real.”Today 20.12 you can still see this strange technological happening on http://soniakasten.wordpress.com If anyone has an explanation for the event, let him just write a … comment! (Under: ‘I just needed a proof.)Atte.
Por orden,
Sonja Kasten
|
|
|
|
Buscar en Microsoft.com:
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
PUBLICADO EN ‘SONJAKASTEN1’ tras copiar texto aparecido en splitters21.12.2006
Myself (debe tener inserto funciones de imagen en encabezado)
Makes WordPress cheap publicity
- Home
- Censorship
- Comments
- Economy
- Instructions
- Lust and love
- Metaphysical frame
- Psychology
- Referential authors
- Statistics
- THE LINKS
Response
A French journalist said after having read the article on international right: “This is completely idealistic.” (With a heavy French accent, by the way.) “May be,” I replied, “but contradictions are quite real.”Today 20.12 you can still see this strange technological happening on http://soniakasten.wordpress.com If anyone has an explanation for the event, let him just write a … comment! (Under: ‘I just needed a proof.)Atte.
Por orden,
Sonja Kasten
|
|
|
|
Buscar en Microsoft.com: |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Administre su perfil |Contacte con nosotros ©2006 Microsoft Corporation. Todos los derechos reservados. Condiciones de uso |Marcas registradas |Declaración de Privacidad |
var msviFooter2; if (document.getElementById) { msviFooter2 = document.getElementById(”msviFooter2″); msviFooter2.style.filter = “”; }
footerjs(document);
cambiaselect2(document.FORM, ‘CAT’, ‘SUBCAT’, valores2, nombres2);
Comments (0October 29th, 2006 Posted by sonjakasten1 | technology, Observations, computer, censorship, Computers, Social, Anecdotes, Psychology, Economy, tecnology, Philosophy and religion, Publicity, programms | No Comments
PAGINA ‘POST’ WORDPRESS EN ‘MYSELF’ DÍA 21.12.2006Parte del texto antes inserto y publicado en http://soniakasten.wordpress.com, aparece fuera del recuadro del envío, mientras lo no publicado, aun se encuentra ahíTitle
Post
|
if ( typeof tinyMCE != “undefined” && tinyMCE.configs.length > 0 ) document.getElementById(‘edButtons’).style.display = ‘block’; edToolbar() if ( typeof tinyMCE != “undefined” && tinyMCE.configs.length > 0 ) document.getElementById(“quicktags”).style.display=”none”; function edInsertContent(myField, myValue) { //IE support if (document.selection) { myField.focus(); sel = document.selection.createRange(); sel.text = myValue; myField.focus(); } //MOZILLA/NETSCAPE support else if (myField.selectionStart || myField.selectionStart == “0″) { var startPos = myField.selectionStart; var endPos = myField.selectionEnd; myField.value = myField.value.substring(0, startPos) + myValue + myField.value.substring(endPos, myField.value.length); myField.focus(); myField.selectionStart = startPos + myValue.length; myField.selectionEnd = startPos + myValue.length; } else { myField.value += myValue; myField.focus(); } }
|
Sus datos serán introducidos en nuestro fichero automatizado de datos de carácter personal cuyo responsable es Microsoft Ibérica, S.R.L. con domicilio en Paseo del Club Deportivo, 1, Centro Empresarial
La Finca – Edificio 1, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid). La finalidad del tratamiento de sus datos es la de poder remitirle (siempre a través nuestro) información comercial de su interés, de Microsoft y de otras empresas del sector informático.Usted tiene derecho a acceder, rectificar o cancelar sus datos personales contenidos en dicho fichero. Si usted no desea recibirla, por favor comuníquenoslo indicando claramente su nombre, apellidos y dirección.Para ejercitar sus derechos de oposición, acceso, rectificación y cancelación, por favor póngase en contacto con nuestro Departamento de Atención al Cliente por teléfono en el número [902 197 198], o por fax en el número [91 391 93 00] bien vía web en http://www.microsoft.com/spain/mssrl/Gracias.Última actualización: 23 de mayo de 2005
|
Administre su perfil |Contacte con nosotros ©2006 Microsoft Corporation. Todos los derechos reservados. Condiciones de uso |Marcas registradas |Declaración de Privacidad |
var msviFooter2; if (document.getElementById) { msviFooter2 = document.getElementById(”msviFooter2″); msviFooter2.style.filter = “”; }
footerjs(document);
cambiaselect2(document.FORM, ‘CAT’, ‘SUBCAT’, valores2, nombres2);Comments (0This feature requires iframe support. Optional Excerpt Trackbacks Send trackbacks to: (Separate multiple URIs with spaces)
CONTENIDO DEL RECUADRO DE ‘POST’
A French journalist said after having read the article on international right: “This is completely idealistic.” (With a heavy French accent, by the way.) “May be,” I replied, “but contradictions are quite real.”Today 20.12 you can still see this strange technological happening on http://soniakasten.wordpress.com If anyone has an explanation for the event, let him just write a … comment! (Under: ‘I just needed a proof.)Atte.
Por orden,
Sonja Kasten
|
|
|
|
Buscar en Microsoft.com:
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
Hello world!
Posted December 24, 2006 by bgcentroestudiosCategories: Uncategorized
Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!
